Reasoning About Social Choice Functions

نویسندگان

  • Nicolas Troquard
  • Wiebe van der Hoek
  • Michael Wooldridge
چکیده

We introduce a logic specifically designed to support reasoning about social choice functions. The logic includes operators to capture strategic ability, and operators to capture agent preferences. We establish a correspondence between formulae in the logic and properties of social choice functions, and show that the logic is expressively complete with respect to social choice functions, i.e., that every social choice function can be characterised as a formula of the logic. We prove that the logic is decidable, and give a complete axiomatization. To demonstrate the value of the logic, we show in particular how it can be applied to the problem of determining whether a social choice function is strategy-proof.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Logics of Interaction , Coalitions and Social Choice ( extended abstract )

While different forms of social interaction have been extensively studied in several fields, the development of formal logics makes precise knowledge representation and mechanical reasoning about situations involving social interaction possible. In particular, such logics make it possible to formally specify and verify software implementing social mechanisms. In my talk I will give an overview ...

متن کامل

A Computational Account of Social Reasoning

People are amateur social psychologists: they explain other people’s behavior, infer what other people are thinking and feeling, and predict how other people will act. I will refer to this sort of psychologizing as social reasoning in order to highlight the fact that it involves reasoning about people. Social reasoning often requires significant leaps of inductive inference: people infer others...

متن کامل

A Syntactic Proof of Arrow's Theorem in a Modal Logic of Social Choice Functions

We show how to formalise Arrow’s Theorem on the impossibility of devising a method for preference aggregation that is both independent of irrelevant alternatives and Pareto efficient by using a modal logic of social choice functions. We also provide a syntactic proof of the theorem in that logic. While prior work has been successful in applying tools from logic and automated reasoning to social...

متن کامل

Early emerging system for reasoning about the social nature of food.

Selecting appropriate foods is a complex and evolutionarily ancient problem, yet past studies have revealed little evidence of adaptations present in infancy that support sophisticated reasoning about perceptual properties of food. We propose that humans have an early-emerging system for reasoning about the social nature of food selection. Specifically, infants' reasoning about food choice is t...

متن کامل

Neural Basis of Strategic Decision Making.

Human choice behaviors during social interactions often deviate from the predictions of game theory. This might arise partly from the limitations in the cognitive abilities necessary for recursive reasoning about the behaviors of others. In addition, during iterative social interactions, choices might change dynamically as knowledge about the intentions of others and estimates for choice outcom...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • J. Philosophical Logic

دوره 40  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011